Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
What I'm trying to say is that I think it's perfectly fine for the listener to enjoy reconstructing the work on their own.
But to say, "This album should have been composed of only this suite. “ etc…
I was very uncomfortable to read that kind of talk.
If it's an "ideal live set list", I'd like to see a lot of opinions from everyone.
We listeners are the ones who are given the artist's work, and I'd like to see a little more thought put into why the work was created the way it was. Even in the thread of the latest work, I was fed up with the excessive criticism of the old listeners.
I'm not a native speaker of English, so I'm writing this through a translator, but I hope it conveys the nuances I want to say.
I'm not saying don't criticize, I'm just suggesting that the residents of the official forum can appreciate the work a little more modestly and respectfully without being arrogant.
Personally, I think one of the reasons why this album is so controversial is that it lacks the pop-ness that they have always worn.
They did a great job mixing The Watcher with The Crimson Eye. It's even more interesting than when I heard it on the PULSATOR score.
It was too expensive to buy from Japan, but I had no choice but to pay for it as insurance in case I couldn't get it later.
Bent's and Snah's positions have changed again from the recent ones, how are their positions determined?
I prefer Bent to be on the left side of the stage.
Thank you!
Do you know who Lacktr is who did the cover design for this project? Had this person ever worked on an MP record before?
N.O.X. was great, of course, but the other songs and TSOR,
which people didn't respond to as much as they should have,
were awesome in person…
I think it would be fun to listen to the A-side and D-side together.
