Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
A couple of legal cases.
Top lawyer Dr. Reiner Fuellmich successfully prosecuted VW over the emissions scandal and convicted Deutsche Bank as a criminal enterprise. He is working hard, as part of the Corona Investigative Committee, to bring a class action lawsuit in Germany.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QBie_mrytmw
Meanwhile, in the UK, Michael O'Bernicia (The Bernician) has just laid papers alleging Pandemic Fraud.
Irrelevant and unpleasant comments to follow as usual, I suppose.
These could all simply be coincidences. I just wish everyone well.
@boomer former helm
Thanks. I wasn't aware of it, but I'll definitely be getting that Amorphous Androgynous album to add to my Monstrous Psychedelic Bubble collection (all recommnded).
Listening to Motorpsycho: The N.O.X. Suite Part, thoughts and opinion
K÷93
released last Friday
If you can get past everything else competing for your attention, listen to the guitar's beautiful tone and shimmering chords. As one comment has it, "That guitar feels like melted chocolate being poured into my ears by a naked lady!"
Quote:First of all, I take my hat off to you for doing that kind of work rather than chasing money and a bogus form of status. I also pay tribute to you for asserting that having this discussion here is perfectly valid. However, I must ask, do you really think I am so inhuman as to care less about such vulnerable people than I do about my little bit of freedom? What makes you think that?I accept that I made an error of judgement. I tried to strike a conciliatory tone, even though you had misrepresented and insulted me. I should have realised that you don't read carefully, as further evidenced by your recent, unjustified, unpleasant and wide-of-the-mark invective.
Even those who agree with you will remember, once the dust has settled, your nasty manner.
By the way, no, there's nothing wrong with making money. Chasing money – the term I used – is something quite different. Take a look at the eye-watering amounts raked in by the pharmaceutical companies. Do you think there's no room for corruption there?
I had already seen that, for most people, it is only once they or a loved one are seriously damaged by the pharmaceutical industry that they begin to ask questions. Then they start to wonder why they didn't ask questions before. Even if none of these beleaguered scientists' warnings ever come true, sadly, that is going to be an experience a fair few reading this will have to go through. It is desperately sad.
With chasing money and the pharmaceutical industry particularly in mind, I am reminded of something from somewhere:
"Love of money is the root of all evil."
This article really helped me to understand what's been going on on this thread.
It also does a good job of explaining how it is that we are ruled by sociopaths.
I take my tin foil hat off to the author.
Really sorry to hear that. My best wishes for the young person's recovery.
I bet you enjoyed that! You made me smile too.
Let's just accept that debunking. I shouldn't have added it – it's getting further away from the topic, anyway.
But, you're not worried about Bill Gates' plans?
Not exactly off-topic, as Bill Gates is absolutely central to what is happening, and since other forum members keep on bringing climate change into the proceedings:
"Harvard Scientists Funded by Bill Gates to Begin Spraying Particles Into the Sky In Experiment to Dim the Sun"
https://thefreethoughtproject.com/harvard-geoengineering-particles-stratosphere/
Hmm,,, Think that's a good idea? Even if some predictions, based on solar cycles and activity as well as the historical record, that we're headed for a new mini-ice-age are wrong, it still doesn't strike me as 'awfully wise'.
I know you like your 'fact-checkers'. I thought I'd see how they handled this. One said,
"But there is no suggestion he is in favor of blocking all sunlight from reaching Earth." (my italics). You've got to laugh, haven't you?
Sociopaths like this, who have the real power, represent a grave danger not only to the human race, but to all life on the planet.
Or do you choose to believe?
On a related note, but more on topic, since it involves aerosol vaccines:
"NASA Admits Spraying Skies"
https://www.thinkaboutit.online/nasa-admits-spraying-skies/
Since you can no longer call these 'conspiracy theories', the next stage is to tell me it's all perfectly OK – there's nothing to worry about. Good luck!
Exactly what were the profiles of those involved in the trials? How long did the trials last? Are they complete? Just a few of the questions one should ask.
As if I should need to make this point, I emphatically do not want the weak to die. Always and in everything, I feel it is my duty to defend the weak.
Who is making the Nietzchean argument? Why not look at the eugenicist roots of some of those involved in pushing the agenda?
One of the foremost Nietzcheans these days, it seeems, is Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel, recently appointed to Biden's COVID-19 advisory board. He thinks that nobody should live beyond 75, and that health care should be apportioned according to how 'worthwhile' the life is. Take a look. This is for real. Avoiding the temptation to make cheap jokes about Biden's age, I'll just ask, is everyone comfortable with that?
Eugenics never went away, but it had to become stealthy. Don't imagine it is the exclusive preserve of the rabid right-winger.
"Forced vaccination. Immunity passports. The erection of a biosecurity state. For the first time, the eugenics-infused philosophers of bioethics are on the verge of gaining real power. And the public is still largely unaware of the discussions that these academics have been engaged in for decades."
'Bioethics and the New Eugenics'
Those who do not ask questions: wouldn't they be the ones with the 'religious belief system'?
@Johhny_Heartfield
Are you truly fully informed about how very different these new experimental vaccines are from any vaccines that there have ever been before?
How do you know these vaccines are not going to produce serious problems in the long term?
I hope it isn't because Elton John told you they were safe…
In 1976, Elton John was also pushing the Swine Flu vaccine they wanted everyone to have (there was no need). That didn't go too well:
https://www.organiclifestylemagazine.com/deja-vu-the-swine-flu-vaccination-fraud-of-1976
Have they got something on Elton?
(comments now turned off because the vast majority were scathing)
@TheOneFormerlyKnownAsDaniel
Yes, our immune systems are amazing. On the whole, only in those with weak immune systems (mainly the elderly) is COVID-19 a real problem. I don't make light of that. Every case is a tragedy. Old Lives Matter. Like most, I have elderly people close to me about whom I am very concerned. The brutal truth though is that flu, pneumonia and the like are often the 'straw that breaks the camel's back' at the end of life. So, either COVID-19 has been doing that job recently, or, at least perhaps in some case, it wasn't COVID-19, but that is what ended up on the death certificate.
For most, the immune system will deal with it – that is, until you start messing with everyone's immune systems with these very different, not properly tested, new experimental vaccines, produced by companies with long criminal records – companies that are immune from prosecution in the event of injury or death.
You want to gamble? I'd say all bets are off.
Thank you for trying to soothe me and reduce my worries, and thank you for being friendly.
I had a look at the Dr. Michael Yeadon article to which you referred,
https://lockdownsceptics.org/how-robust-is-covid-immunity/
but I'm afraid I couldn't find much comfort in it.
The authors refer to the long observed pattern of the evolution of viruses towards being less dangerous. It is not in the viruses' interests to kill everybody, since they want to spread. So that would be good, but, unfortunately, it applies only if they are left alone, as the article explains.
My understanding is that this attenuation is why the Spanish Flu (February 2018 – April 2020) was all over in two years, without any intervention.
The authors say that the variants around just now are not more dangerous than the 'original', even though we are being told the opposite, and this would certainly be in line with expectations.
However, they include this statement, which relates, I think, to Dr. Yeadon's view:
"Some feel that novel pharmaceuticals and non-pharmaceutical interventions – or specific circumstances – could possibly disrupt this evolutionary process and favour a more severe variant or threaten acquired immunity."
and they finish by warning that overconfidence in vaccine effectiveness for the very old could be a major risk.
Here is Dr. Yeadon's Coronavirus Vaccine Safety Petition. Note especially the first concern, regarding antibody-dependent amplification (antibody-dependent enhancement – ADE). This is the same as the pathogenic priming and cytokine storm I have been highlighting:
https://dryburgh.com/mike-yeadon-coronavirus-vaccine-safety-concerns-petition/
Other important points are highlighted in blue.
Maybe it's not bed-time reading!
You're making a lot of sense. Entries like that make this a great forum.
@ Kid A
I understand the concept of false balance, but will you concede that there is a big difference between, on the one hand, the arguments for and against, say, an even two-handed discussion in a national TV studio in which one person represents 90% of the number of experts and the other 10%, and, on the other hand, kicking every dissenting expert off every major internet platform?
Quote:…not every voice should be heard…it´s ok to "silence" peopleAre you sure about that? Shall I put you down under the heading, 'don't care about freedom'?
My grandfather had a reserved occupation. He didn't have to go to war, but he felt compelled to do so in order to help defeat an evil tyranny, and he gave his life in the process. Under that regime, there was a prevailing scientific orthodoxy, from which sprang the most heinous acts. If you spend just a couple of moments looking at it, you will soon see that it was utterly insane. However, at the time, if, as a scientist, you spoke against it, your career was over. There have been many similar examples throughout history.
But it could never be happenning here and now, could it?
'The international scientific community' is one of those phrases that sits alongside 'the science says'. Is it so unbelievable that the actually quite small number of experts driving policy forward could have, in polite terms, a conflict of interests? What is the basis for your child-like faith in them?
Perhaps the scientists who are trying to warn us, and whom you want silenced, are 'self-righteous', and do have 'big egos'. I am not able to judge. How are you able to judge?
These would have to be egos so large that they don't take into consideration the likely ridicule and condemnation from their peers? Isn't it more likely that, If you had a big ego, you would want the approval that goes with swimming in the mainstream and saying all the 'right' things?
On what basis do you ascribe to these scientists 'half-knowledge'?
I don't know what your beef is with vets, but a professor of molecular biology, former chief scientist at Pfizer, etc. – they're not vets, are they?
But, to speak up for vets: they are intelligent people, who have studied for years, and have many more years real-world experience. Are you so sure a vet would not be able to work out what is going on?
Quote:Facts are facts.Where do I go with that one?! It's unarguable, isn't it? You've got me!
It's so interesting that all the vicious, personal attacks, whether on the scientists trying to warn us or on those of us here trying to give ear to them, come from people who want to believe things are just as they are presented.
Why is that? I'm sure it reveals something.
Actually, I would really like to believe that things are basically all above-board too, but I'm not prepared simply to dismiss these other voices. The stakes are too high.
As i keep repeating ad nauseam, I hope they're wrong, and I hope I am an idiot for listening to them.
@the conscience
That Schopenhauer quote is just absolutely perfect.
